Skip to content

Competence & Performance Management

The objective factors behind pay, captured in one place.

Performance ratings, skills, certificates and role evaluation surveys are exactly the evidence that justifies pay differences under the directive. Here they sit next to compensation instead of in a separate HR silo.

45 minutes. See competence data feeding a pay decision.

The objective factors behind pay, captured in one place.
What you can track

Evidence for pay decisions, not a parallel process.

Performance

Ratings with a clear owner and period

Rating based reviews with defined review periods, notes and reviewer tracking. Managers handle their own direct reports, and the results become factors in pay analysis rather than a file nobody opens again.

  • Review periods, notes and reviewer tracking
  • Managers review their own direct reports
  • Ratings feed equity analysis and cycle suggestions
See performance reviews
Skills

A skills library that stays consistent

A two tier structure of categories and skills, each with proficiency levels, aliases, a demand level and market value tagging. One shared library means two teams cannot quietly mean different things by the same skill.

  • Categories and skills with proficiency levels
  • Aliases so naming differences do not fragment the data
  • Demand level and market value tagging
Explore skills management
Certificates

Qualifications that expire on your radar

Template based tracking of qualifications with categories, issuers and expiration dates. Where a certificate is a genuine requirement for a role, it is also a legitimate factor in what that role pays.

  • Templates with categories and issuers
  • Expiration tracking so lapses do not surprise you
  • Usable as an objective factor in pay justification
See certificate tracking
Role evaluation surveys

Surveys people answer honestly

Structured surveys for employees and managers, with an anonymous mode that stores no respondent identity with the answers, several question types, scheduling with automated reminders and multi language support. Useful input when you are evaluating what a role actually involves.

  • Anonymous mode that never stores who answered
  • Scheduling with automated reminders
  • Multiple question types and multi language support
See survey setup

Why this belongs next to pay

Competence data is only compliance evidence if it reaches the analysis.

01

Capture the evidence

Ratings, skills, certificates and survey responses in one place.

02

It becomes a pay factor

Competence data enters the equity analysis as regression factors.

03

It shapes suggestions

Merit cycle recommendations account for performance and skills.

04

It supports justifications

Objective factors are already documented when you need them.

Common questions about competence and performance

Because performance, skills and qualifications are the objective factors the directive expects you to point at when a pay difference needs explaining. Kept in a separate HR system, that evidence never reaches the analysis. Kept here, it does.

Ready to connect competence to pay?

See how ratings, skills and certificates support a pay decision.