Pay transparency in Poland
-
Pay information requests Partly in force
Own pay level and sex-disaggregated average pay levels for workers performing the same work or work of equal value (proposed under UC127).
Check the scope of what has commenced.
-
Salary history questions are banned
Applicants learn the pay range before the interview, and employers may not ask what they earn today.
Poland has moved in two stages. Recruitment-stage pay transparency rules are already in force, effective from 24 December 2025, under the Act of 4 June 2025 amending the Labour Code. A wider equal-pay bill, known as UC127, would add reporting duties, an employee pay-information right and joint pay assessments, but it is still pending and not yet law.
The enacted piece covers what happens before someone signs an offer: pay ranges shared with candidates, a ban on asking about salary history, gender-neutral job titles and nondiscriminatory recruitment practices. It does not yet touch what happens after someone joins, such as ongoing reporting or comparator pay information for existing staff.
For now, it helps to think of Poland as two separate tracks: the recruitment rules that already apply to you, and the UC127 package that you should watch closely without treating it as binding.
The measure
- Law or measure
- Act of 4 June 2025 amending the Labour Code for recruitment transparency; broader UC127 equal-pay bill pending
- Core obligations start
- 24 Dec 2025 (recruitment rules)
- Who is covered
- Adopted recruitment duties apply broadly; the remaining pay-structure, information and reporting duties are pending
What the law requires
- Pay range before the interview Source for: Pay range before the interview
- Salary history questions banned Source for: Salary history questions banned
- Pay information requests Source for: Pay information requests
- Gap reporting from 100 employees Source for: Gap reporting from 100 employees
- Joint pay assessment at a 5.0% gap Source for: Joint pay assessment at a 5.0% gap
How Poland differs from the Directive
Poland has enacted recruitment pay transparency effective 24 December 2025, while the broader equal-pay/transparency bill UC127 remains pending.
What this means for employers
Because the recruitment rules are already in force, your hiring process needs attention now. That means job postings, interview practices and offer letters should reflect the new pay-range disclosure duty and the ban on asking about salary history. The rest of the picture, including reporting, employee pay information rights and joint pay assessments, is still shaped by a bill that has not passed, so none of it is mandatory yet.
- Update hiring materials: build pay-range disclosure and the salary-history ban into job postings, recruiter scripts and offer letters.
- Check job titles and criteria: make sure they are gender-neutral and based on objective factors, as the recruitment rules require.
- Watch UC127, don’t act on it yet: it would introduce a pay information right, reporting from 100 employees, and a 5% pay-gap trigger for a joint pay assessment, but none of this is enacted.
- Avoid premature builds: hold off finalizing reporting or joint pay assessment processes around numbers that could still change before UC127 passes.
- Know who enforces what: the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy and the National Labour Inspectorate oversee these rules, with the Commissioner for Human Rights acting as equality body.
Enforcement and open questions
- Competent authority
- Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy; National Labour Inspectorate
- Equality body
- Commissioner for Human Rights
- What could still change
- Do not treat the recruitment amendment as complete transposition; the broader bill can still change.
Common questions
Is Poland's pay transparency law already in force?
Part of it is. The recruitment-stage rules from the Act of 4 June 2025 are in force as of 24 December 2025. The broader equal-pay bill, UC127, which would cover reporting and employee pay-information rights, is still pending and not yet law.
What do Poland's recruitment pay transparency rules actually require?
Employers must give candidates the initial pay amount or range based on objective, gender-neutral criteria, and cannot ask about pay in the applicant's current or previous job. Job titles and recruitment practices also need to be gender-neutral and nondiscriminatory. These duties are already in force.
Will Poland require gender pay gap reporting?
Not yet. The pending UC127 bill proposes mandatory reporting starting at 100 employees, with the employer preparing the report through an IT tool made available by a monitoring body with support from Statistics Poland. No first reporting dates have been set yet.
What pay information would employees get under Poland's proposed rules?
UC127 proposes a right for workers to see their own pay level and sex-disaggregated average pay for people doing the same work or work of equal value. This right is not yet in force, it exists only as a proposal.
What would trigger a joint pay assessment in Poland?
UC127 proposes a 5% pay gap at category level as the trigger, along with additional cumulative conditions. This is a proposed rule, not an obligation currently in force.
Who enforces pay transparency rules in Poland?
The Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy and the National Labour Inspectorate are the competent authorities. The Commissioner for Human Rights serves as the equality body.
- Pay information request right Art. 7(1)
- Partly in force
- Salary range in recruitment Art. 5(1)
- Yes
- Salary history questions banned Art. 5(2)
- Yes
- Joint pay assessment trigger Art. 10(1)
- 5.0%
Own pay level and sex-disaggregated average pay levels for workers performing the same work or work of equal value (proposed under UC127).
UC127 proposes a right to the worker's own pay level and sex-disaggregated category averages; it is not enacted.
Read the sourceApplicants receive the pay or pay range before the interview, based on objective, gender-neutral criteria.
Applicants must receive the initial pay amount or range based on objective, gender-neutral criteria.
Read the sourceWhether employers are prohibited from asking applicants about their current or previous pay.
The employer may not require information about remuneration in the applicant's current or previous employment.
Read the sourceThe unjustified gap that obliges the employer and worker representatives to assess pay together.
UC127 proposes a 5% category-level gap trigger, subject to the additional cumulative conditions.
Read the sourceStill being verified against official sources: response deadline.
- Reporting threshold
- 100 employees
- Reporting model
- Proposed employer-calculated Operational data-production and filing model for pay-gap reporting: employer-calculated, authority-calculated, hybrid, proposed, pre-existing or absent.
- Metrics required
- EU seven only Art. 9(1): Seven metrics: mean gap; variable-component gap; median gap; median variable gap; variable-pay participation by sex; quartile distribution by sex; category-level gap split basic and variable.
- Pre-existing regime
- Recruitment-stage rules are enacted; the broader reporting, employee-information and joint-pay-assessment package remains in draft.
- Formal transposition stage
- Partly in force
- Scope
- Specific Directive provisions only
Next milestone
Apply recruitment rules and monitor UC127 for the remaining obligations.
Primary sources
- Act of 4 June 2025 amending the Labour Code for recruitment transparency; broader UC127 equal-pay bill pending Primary source, checked 7 August 2026
- Formal transposition stage Partly in force · in force · high confidence
- Core employer obligations Partly in force · in force · high confidence
- Transposition scope Specific Directive provisions only · in force · high confidence
- Salary range in recruitment Yes · in force · high confidence
- Salary history questions banned Yes · in force · high confidence
- Pay information request right Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting threshold 100 · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting model Proposed employer-calculated · proposed · high confidence
- Joint pay assessment trigger 5% · proposed · high confidence
This page is maintained by Evenpay from official primary sources and reviewed before publication. It is general information, not legal advice. Requirements vary by member state and change as national laws progress; figures described as proposed are subject to amendment.