Pay transparency in Netherlands
-
Pay information requests Proposed
Employees can ask for their own pay level and the averages for colleagues doing equal or equal-value work, broken down by sex.
In the published draft, not yet in force.
-
Time to respond 2 months
Every request starts a clock. Answering one needs pay structures and equal-value groupings that already exist.
-
Salary history questions are banned
Applicants learn the pay range before the interview, and employers may not ask what they earn today.
The Netherlands has a published draft bill in progress to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive, plus an implementing regulation that is still under consultation. Nothing here is law yet: the bill, known as dossier 36 949, is pending in parliament, and the rules could still change before they take effect.
The government’s current plan points to core employer obligations starting on 1 January 2027, but this date is proposed, not confirmed. Until the bill passes, employers in the Netherlands are not yet bound by any Directive-specific pay transparency duties.
The explanatory memorandum sets out a staggered reporting timeline: employers with at least 150 workers would report first, followed later by employers with 100 to 149 workers. Both dates sit years ahead, but the groundwork for meeting them starts well before the deadline.
The measure
- Law or measure
- Bill implementing Directive (EU) 2023/970 on pay transparency; implementing regulation under consultation
- Core obligations start
- 1 Jan 2027 (proposed)
- Who is covered
- Proposed rules cover public and private employment; reporting begins at 100 employees
What the law requires
- Pay range before the interview Source for: Pay range before the interview
- Salary history questions banned Source for: Salary history questions banned
- Pay information requests, 2 months to respond Source for: Pay information requests, 2 months to respond
- Gap reporting from 100 employees Source for: Gap reporting from 100 employees
- Joint pay assessment at a 5.0% gap Source for: Joint pay assessment at a 5.0% gap
How Netherlands differs from the Directive
The draft follows a pure-implementation approach rather than adding stricter national duties. Key Dutch choices include the under-50 exemption from pay-progression-criteria access, no mandatory reporting below 100, employer-calculated reporting aligned to payroll data, and a strong works-council role in reporting and remediation. The 2 Sep Nota van Wijziging corrects the salary-history burden-of-proof coverage and an accidental WOR exception affecting reporting involvement.
What this means for employers
Because the bill is still a draft, several details that matter for planning, including the employee pay information right, salary range rules and any salary history ban, are not yet defined for the Netherlands. That is not a gap in this tracker, it reflects where the legislation itself currently stands. What is known is that a gender pay gap of 5.0% is the proposed trigger for a joint pay assessment, and that reporting would be employer-calculated rather than government-calculated.
- Watch the bill’s progress through parliament, since the proposed obligations and dates could shift with amendments.
- Follow the implementing regulation, which entered consultation in July 2026 and will fill in operational detail once finalised.
- Start building proposed controls for recruitment pay information, employee pay information requests, gender pay gap reporting and joint pay assessments, even while the rules are not final.
- Map your workforce size against the proposed 150-plus and 100-149 employee bands, since your first reporting date would depend on which one you fall into.
None of this guarantees compliance once the law is finalised, but preparing early helps you avoid a scramble when the bill is enacted.
Enforcement and open questions
- Competent authority
- Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment; Netherlands Labour Authority
- Equality body
- Netherlands Institute for Human Rights
- What could still change
- Bill 36 949 remains pending. Government response 36949-6 and Nota van Wijziging 36949-7 were published 2 Sep 2026. The Government still targets 1 Jan 2027 commencement, but this is not enacted. The amendment fixes salary-history coverage in the special burden-of-proof rule, removes an accidental WOR exception for a small employer group in reporting involvement, and makes a Waadi/Wtta technical concurrency correction. The committee procedure meeting is scheduled for 8 Sep; the draft ministerial-regulation consultation remains open through 11 Sep.
Common questions
Has the Netherlands passed the EU Pay Transparency Directive into national law?
Not yet. The Netherlands has a published draft bill, known as dossier 36 949, which is still pending in parliament, and an implementing regulation that is under consultation. Until the bill is enacted, its employer obligations remain proposed rather than binding.
When would pay transparency obligations start for employers in the Netherlands?
The government's proposal points to 1 January 2027 for core obligations, but this date is not yet confirmed since the bill has not passed. Reporting deadlines are staggered separately by employer size.
Which employers would need to report gender pay gap data in the Netherlands?
Under the current proposal, employers with at least 150 workers would report first, with data due by 7 June 2028 covering 2027. Employers with 100 to 149 workers would follow, with data due by 7 June 2031 covering 2030.
What triggers a joint pay assessment under the Dutch proposal?
The proposed threshold is a gender pay gap of 5.0%. This figure comes from the draft legislation and could still change before the bill is finalised.
Who would oversee pay transparency rules in the Netherlands?
The Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment and the Netherlands Labour Authority are named as the competent authorities. The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights is the designated equality body.
- Pay information request right Art. 7(1)
- Proposed
- Response deadline Art. 7(4)
- 2 months
- Salary range in recruitment Art. 5(1)
- Yes
- Salary history questions banned Art. 5(2)
- Yes
- Joint pay assessment trigger Art. 10(1)
- 5.0%
Employees may request their individual pay level and the averages for workers performing equal or equal-value work, broken down by sex.
Workers would have a written-request right to their own pay level and sex-disaggregated average pay levels for categories performing the same or equivalent work.
Read the sourceThe employer must answer in writing within this period.
The requested employee pay information would have to be provided within a reasonable period and no later than two months after the request.
Read the sourceApplicants receive the pay or pay range before the interview, based on objective, gender-neutral criteria.
The bill requires employers to provide the initial pay or pay range based on objective, gender-neutral criteria in time for informed pay negotiations; publication in the vacancy is optional rather than mandatory.
Read the sourceWhether employers are prohibited from asking applicants about their current or previous pay.
The bill prohibits asking a candidate about pay in current or previous employment relationships, directly or indirectly; not enacted.
Read the sourceThe unjustified gap that obliges the employer and worker representatives to assess pay together.
The draft uses a 5% category-level threshold together with lack of objective justification and failure to remedy within six months.
Read the source- Reporting threshold
- 100 employees
- Reporting model
- Proposed employer-calculated Operational data-production and filing model for pay-gap reporting: employer-calculated, authority-calculated, hybrid, proposed, pre-existing or absent.
- First report, 250 or more employees
- By 7 Jun 2028 (2027 data)
- First report, 100 to 149 employees
- By 7 Jun 2031 (2030 data)
- Metrics required
- Different / modified Art. 9(1): Seven metrics: mean gap; variable-component gap; median gap; median variable gap; variable-pay participation by sex; quartile distribution by sex; category-level gap split basic and variable.
- Formal transposition stage
- Published draft
- Scope
- Nationwide
Next milestone
Committee procedure meeting 8 Sep 2026; draft ministerial-regulation consultation closes 11 Sep 2026; then monitor any further amendments, parliamentary debate/vote and enactment/commencement.
Primary sources
- Bill implementing Directive (EU) 2023/970 on pay transparency; implementing regulation under consultation Primary source, checked 7 September 2026
- Formal transposition stage Published draft · proposed · high confidence
- Core employer obligations Not operational · proposed · high confidence
- Transposition scope Nationwide · proposed · high confidence
- Salary range in recruitment Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Salary history questions banned Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Pay information request right Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Response deadline 2 months · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting threshold 100 · proposed · high confidence
- First report, 250 or more employees By 7 Jun 2028 (2027 data) · proposed · high confidence
- First report, 100 to 149 employees By 7 Jun 2031 (2030 data) · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting model Proposed employer-calculated · proposed · high confidence
- Joint pay assessment trigger 5% · proposed · high confidence
- Info reference period Unclear · unclear · high confidence
- Info pay basis Unclear · unclear · high confidence
- Info pay components scope Different / modified · proposed · high confidence
- Info request frequency At any time / no stated limit · proposed · high confidence
- Info employee reference period eligibility No prior-reference-period service condition was identified in the bill; the comparator/reference period for employee information remains to be specified/confirmed. · proposed · high confidence
- Info normalisation method Unclear · unclear · high confidence
- Reporting reference period Previous calendar year · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting pay basis Payroll + contractual / mixed · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting pay components scope Different / modified · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting population basis Previous-calendar-year workforce; own employees and supplied workers are calculated/reported separately. Included employment relationships require positive gross pay and paid hours under specified payroll-income codes; internationally, inclusion is tied to Dutch payroll-tax status. The hirer reports supplied workers. · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting normalisation method Draft methodology requires both annual- and hourly-basis calculations. Annual gross/variable pay is summed for the reporting year without part-time/FTE adjustment; annual paid hours use loonaangifte 'verloonde uren'; hourly values divide annual amounts by annual paid hours. Own employees and supplied workers are calculated separately. · proposed · high confidence
- Employer required input data RSIN/reporting year; loonaangifte payroll relationship/income codes; gross pay; paid hours; base and variable/additional components; sex; equal/equivalent-work category; own vs supplied-worker status; worker identifier; and agency assignment/payroll data for supplied workers, plus employer/KvK metadata needed by the reporting form. · proposed · high confidence
- First data period needed Proposed: 2027 data for the first 2028 report for 150+ employers; 2030 data for 100-149 employers. · proposed · high confidence
- Own pay information Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Comparator information Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Comparator information start 1 Jan 2027 (proposed) · proposed · high confidence
Change history
Recent updates
Netherlands amends pay-transparency bill and clarifies key employer duties
The Dutch Government has filed a Nota van Wijziging to bill 36 949 and published its detailed response to Parliament.
Netherlands publishes draft pay-reporting calculation rules and template
The Dutch Ministry has opened consultation on the ministerial regulation that operationalises employer pay-gap reporting.
This page is maintained by Evenpay from official primary sources and reviewed before publication. It is general information, not legal advice. Requirements vary by member state and change as national laws progress; figures described as proposed are subject to amendment.
Get notified when Netherlands moves
We verify every change against official sources before it reaches this tracker. Follow the countries that matter to you and the same updates land in your inbox.
Legislation updates only, no marketing. Unsubscribe any time.
