Pay transparency in Spain
-
Pay information requests Proposed
Own pay level and sex-disaggregated average pay levels for categories performing the same work or work of equal value
In the published draft, not yet in force.
-
Time to respond 2 months
Every request starts a clock. Answering one needs pay structures and equal-value groupings that already exist.
Spain already has pay transparency rules in force. Royal Decrees 901/2020 and 902/2020 require a pay register and, for many employers, equality plans and pay audits. These stay in effect right now, regardless of what happens with the EU Directive.
On 3 August 2026, the government published a draft Royal Decree that would amend RD 902/2020 to partially bring Spain in line with the EU Pay Transparency Directive. It is open for public feedback until 24 August 2026, so it is a proposal, not a law employers must follow yet.
The draft would add an employee right to pay information, a two-month response deadline, and a phased pay-gap reporting duty starting from 50 employees. None of this binds employers until a final Royal Decree is adopted and published in the BOE.
The measure
- Law or measure
- Draft Royal Decree amending Royal Decree 902/2020 to partially transpose Directive (EU) 2023/970; Royal Decrees 901/2020 and 902/2020 remain in force
- Core obligations start
- Day after BOE publication (proposed)
- Who is covered
- All employers maintain a pay register; equality plans and pay audits generally apply from 50 employees
What the law requires
- Pay information requests, 2 months to respond Source for: Pay information requests, 2 months to respond
- Gap reporting from 50 employees Source for: Gap reporting from 50 employees
- Joint pay assessment at a No fixed percentage threshold identified in published draft gap Source for: Joint pay assessment at a No fixed percentage threshold identified in published draft gap
2 further dimensions are still being verified against official sources.
How Spain differs from the Directive
Spain combines the live RD 901/2020 and RD 902/2020 pay-register and pay-audit regime with a 3 August 2026 partial-transposition draft. The draft proposes reporting from 50 employees, first 150+ reporting by 7 June 2027 and 50-149 by 7 June 2031, annual/hourly employee information and a national audit-remediation route rather than a fixed 5% JPA trigger. Current Supreme Court case law (STS 1302/2024; STS 620/2026) confirms that the live wage-register mechanism does not create a general right to identifiable coworkers' salaries.
On at least one point the national rules go beyond the Directive minimum, so preparing to the EU baseline alone is not enough here.
What this means for employers
For now, your legal obligations in Spain are the ones already set by Royal Decrees 901/2020 and 902/2020: keep your pay register current, and run equality plans and pay audits if you sit above the existing thresholds. Nothing about the Directive changes that baseline yet.
The draft is worth reading closely because it would extend obligations further down the size scale than many EU peers, starting reporting at 50 employees rather than a higher threshold. If adopted as proposed, larger employers would face their first reporting cycle by 7 June 2027, and employers with 50 to 149 workers by 7 June 2031.
- Keep your current RD 901/2020 and RD 902/2020 controls running: pay register, and equality plans or audits if you meet the existing size thresholds.
- Review the draft Royal Decree before 24 August 2026 if you want to submit feedback, and track the final published version.
- Sketch a workflow for employee pay-information requests, built around a two-month response window and comparisons by pay level and by sex within categories doing the same work or work of equal value.
- Model what reporting from 50 employees would mean for you, including which of the two proposed first-cycle dates would apply to your headcount.
- Note what is still undefined: the draft does not yet settle salary range disclosure or a salary history ban, so treat those as open questions rather than confirmed rules.
Enforcement and open questions
- Competent authority
- Ministry of Labour and Social Economy; Labour and Social Security Inspectorate
- Equality body
- Instituto de las Mujeres
- What could still change
- The public hearing closed on 24 August 2026; all draft employer obligations remain proposed and no final BOE adoption was identified as of 29 August. STS 620/2026 reinforces the current Art. 28.2 ET/RD 902/2020 boundary: transparency requires sufficient aggregated data, not a general colleague-by-colleague salary right, with GDPR minimisation relevant. Do not overgeneralise this rule: STS 727/2026 confirms that separate public-sector transparency law can support individualized public-employee remuneration access. The 22 July Instituto de las Mujeres-ITSS cooperation agreement remains an enforcement-readiness development, not a new employer duty.
Common questions
Is the EU Pay Transparency Directive already law in Spain?
No. Spain's Directive-specific rules exist only as a draft Royal Decree published on 3 August 2026, open for public feedback until 24 August 2026. What is currently in force is the pre-existing regime under Royal Decrees 901/2020 and 902/2020.
What pay-gap reporting threshold is Spain proposing?
The draft proposes reporting from 50 employees, using an employer-calculated model with the EU's seven core metrics. Proposed first due dates are 7 June 2027 for larger employers and 7 June 2031 for employers with 50 to 149 workers, but these dates and the threshold are not yet final.
Would Spanish employees get a right to ask about pay?
Under the draft, yes: employees would be able to request their own pay level plus sex-disaggregated average pay for categories doing the same work or work of equal value, with a proposed two-month response deadline. This right is proposed, not yet in force.
Does Spain have salary range or salary history rules?
These are not yet defined in the current draft. Employers should treat both salary range disclosure and any salary history ban as open questions until the Royal Decree is finalised.
Who enforces pay transparency requirements in Spain?
The Ministry of Labour and Social Economy and the Labour and Social Security Inspectorate are the competent authorities. Instituto de las Mujeres acts as the equality body.
- Pay information request right Art. 7(1)
- Proposed
- Response deadline Art. 7(4)
- 2 months
- Joint pay assessment trigger Art. 10(1)
- No fixed percentage threshold identified in published draft
Own pay level and sex-disaggregated average pay levels for categories performing the same work or work of equal value
Own pay level and sex-disaggregated category averages are proposed.
Read the sourceThe employer must answer in writing within this period.
Proposed employer response deadline.
Read the sourceThe unjustified gap that obliges the employer and worker representatives to assess pay together.
The draft requires unjustified pay inequalities identified through the audit to be corrected within a reasonable period and in any event within six months, but it does not set a fixed percentage JPA trigger. The separate existing 25% remuneration-register justification rule in Article 6 is not a JPA trigger.
Read the sourceStill being verified against official sources: salary range in recruitment, salary history questions banned.
- Reporting threshold
- 50 employees
- Reporting model
- Proposed employer-calculated Operational data-production and filing model for pay-gap reporting: employer-calculated, authority-calculated, hybrid, proposed, pre-existing or absent.
- First report, 250 or more employees
- By 7 Jun 2027 (proposed)
- First report, 100 to 149 employees
- 7 Jun 2031 for employers with 50-149 workers (proposed)
- Metrics required
- EU seven only Art. 9(1): Seven metrics: mean gap; variable-component gap; median gap; median variable gap; variable-pay participation by sex; quartile distribution by sex; category-level gap split basic and variable.
- Pre-existing regime
- Royal Decrees 901/2020 and 902/2020 remain in force. STS 1302/2024 and STS 620/2026 hold that the Article 28.2 ET/RD 902/2020 wage-register regime requires average/median remuneration and does not create a general entitlement to identifiable coworkers' salaries. STS 620/2026 confirmed SAN 115/2025. This does not exclude disclosure under a separate legal basis; STS 727/2026 confirms broader individualized access can apply in public employment under transparency/public-sector rules.
- Formal transposition stage
- Published draft
- Scope
- Nationwide
Next milestone
Monitor any post-hearing revised draft, Consejo de Estado/Council of Ministers approval and BOE publication; also monitor the separate Directive Article 5 recruitment measure and Instituto/ITSS implementation tools.
Primary sources
- Draft Royal Decree amending Royal Decree 902/2020 to partially transpose Directive (EU) 2023/970; Royal Decrees 901/2020 and 902/2020 remain in force Primary source, checked 29 August 2026
- Formal transposition stage Published draft · proposed · high confidence
- Core employer obligations Not operational · proposed · high confidence
- Transposition scope Nationwide · proposed · high confidence
- Pay information request right Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Response deadline 2 months · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting threshold 50 · proposed · high confidence
- First report, 250 or more employees By 7 Jun 2027 (proposed) · proposed · high confidence
- First report, 100 to 149 employees 7 Jun 2031 for employers with 50-149 workers (proposed) · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting model Proposed employer-calculated · proposed · high confidence
- Joint pay assessment trigger No fixed percentage threshold identified in published draft · proposed · high confidence
- Info reference period Unclear · unclear · high confidence
- Info pay basis Unclear · unclear · high confidence
- Info pay components scope Total remuneration / all components · proposed · high confidence
- Info request frequency Multiple / mixed · proposed · high confidence
- Info employee reference period eligibility No prior-service or prior-reference-period eligibility condition is stated in the 3 August draft; the right applies to persons employed and may be exercised once per year or when justified changes occur. · proposed · high confidence
- Info normalisation method Annual and hourly remuneration; the draft does not specify a fuller FTE or partial-year normalisation formula for Article 10 requests. · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting reference period Multiple / mixed · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting pay basis Actual remuneration paid / earned · in force · high confidence
- Reporting pay components scope Different / modified · in force · high confidence
- Reporting population basis All staff including management and senior managers; data is grouped by sex and professional group/category/level/job and, for pay-audit employers, equal-value job groupings. · in force · high confidence
- Reporting normalisation method Mean and median of remuneration actually received in both annual and hourly terms; base salary, each salary supplement and each extrasalary payment are broken out separately. No fuller FTE/partial-year formula is specified in the draft. · proposed · high confidence
- Employer required input data Live RD 902/2020 inputs remain calendar-year payroll for all workers, sex, classification/equal-value groups, base salary, each supplement and extrasalary payment. The draft additionally requires data supporting hourly calculations and at least three years of information for pay-audit diagnosis. · proposed · high confidence
- First data period needed Ongoing live annual remuneration-register data. If the 3 August draft is enacted unchanged: 250+ need 2026 data for the first 7 Jun 2027 report; 150-249 need 2024-2026 for the first 7 Jun 2027 triennial report; 50-149 need 2028-2030 for the first 7 Jun 2031 report. · proposed · high confidence
- Own pay information Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Comparator information Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Comparator information start Day after BOE publication (proposed) · proposed · high confidence
- Annual average information start Day after BOE publication (proposed) · proposed · high confidence
Change history
Recent updates
Spain: Supreme Court clarifies the boundary between pay transparency and individual salary disclosure
Spain's Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the current wage-register regime requires aggregated average/median remuneration and does not create a general right to identifiable coworkers' salaries.
This page is maintained by Evenpay from official primary sources and reviewed before publication. It is general information, not legal advice. Requirements vary by member state and change as national laws progress; figures described as proposed are subject to amendment.
Get notified when Spain moves
We verify every change against official sources before it reaches this tracker. Follow the countries that matter to you and the same updates land in your inbox.
Legislation updates only, no marketing. Unsubscribe any time.