Pay transparency in Portugal
-
Pay information requests Proposed
Own individual pay plus sex-disaggregated average pay for worker groups performing equal work or work of equal value.
In the published draft, not yet in force.
-
Time to respond 2 months
Every request starts a clock. Answering one needs pay structures and equal-value groupings that already exist.
-
Salary history questions are banned
Applicants learn the pay range before the interview, and employers may not ask what they earn today.
Portugal has published an official draft law that would partially transpose the EU Pay Transparency Directive. The text was released for public appraisal on 5 August 2026, and it is not yet in force. It would amend Law No. 60/2018, which already sets out an equal-pay analysis and corrective-plan regime that Portuguese employers must follow today.
Once adopted, the draft would add recruitment pay-range disclosure, a ban on asking candidates about salary history, a worker right to request pay information, and a reporting obligation starting at 50 employees. None of this binds employers yet. The draft still needs to go through a 20-day appraisal period and formal submission to Parliament before it becomes law.
For now, the live obligation is Law 60/2018. The draft signals where Portugal intends to go, and in several places it goes further than the Directive’s minimum requirements, including a lower reporting threshold and a faster inspector-led correction process.
The measure
- Law or measure
- Official draft proposal partially transposing Directive (EU) 2023/970; would amend Law No. 60/2018 and the Labour Procedure Code
- Core obligations start
- First day of the month following publication of the final law (proposed)
- Who is covered
- Nationwide proposal. Recruitment and employee-information duties are employer-facing generally; reporting would apply from 50 workers. The draft refers expressly to public and private employers.
What the law requires
- Pay range before the interview Source for: Pay range before the interview
- Salary history questions banned Source for: Salary history questions banned
- Pay information requests, 2 months to respond Source for: Pay information requests, 2 months to respond
- Gap reporting from 50 employees Source for: Gap reporting from 50 employees
- Joint pay assessment at a 5.0% gap Source for: Joint pay assessment at a 5.0% gap
How Portugal differs from the Directive
Published draft would lower mandatory reporting to 50 workers, require annual reporting at 250+ and triennial reporting at 50-249, and use a faster inspector-led correction/JPA sequence than the Directive baseline.
On at least one point the national rules go beyond the Directive minimum, so preparing to the EU baseline alone is not enough here.
What this means for employers
Your immediate obligation in Portugal is Law 60/2018’s equal-pay analysis and corrective-plan regime, which is already in force. The 2026 draft adds new layers on top of that, but they remain proposals until Parliament adopts a final text. Treat the proposed elements as a preparation checklist, not a current legal requirement.
- Keep your Law 60/2018 processes current so you are not starting from zero when the new obligations arrive.
- Map recruitment practices against the proposed duty to disclose an initial pay or pay range to applicants and the proposed ban on asking about salary history.
- Plan for a two-month response window if the draft’s employee pay-information right becomes law, covering both individual pay and sex-disaggregated group averages.
- Check your headcount against the proposed 50-employee reporting threshold, since this is lower than many employers might expect.
- Watch the proposed reporting dates, currently set at 7 June 2027 for 250+ employers and 7 June 2031 for the 50 to 149 band, and remember these are not confirmed.
- Understand the proposed 5% gap trigger for a joint pay assessment, which would follow an inspectorate process rather than apply automatically.
Enforcement and open questions
- Competent authority
- CITE; labour inspectorate; labour-ministry data-processing entity (proposed allocation of functions)
- Equality body
- Commission for Equality in Labour and Employment (CITE)
- Penalties
- The draft classifies breaches of recruitment, reporting, correction and JPA duties as very serious; employee-information breaches as serious; pay-criteria disclosure breaches as minor. Repeated violations may attract accessory sanctions. No euro amount is recorded without a separate primary citation to the general penalty scales.
- What could still change
- The 5 August 2026 text is an official public-appraisal draft and expressly provides only partial transposition. It may change before government submission and parliamentary adoption; configure proposed obligations separately from the live Law 60/2018 regime.
Common questions
Is Portugal's pay transparency law already in force?
No. Portugal has published a draft law, released for public appraisal on 5 August 2026, but it has not been adopted by Parliament. The only regime currently in force is Law 60/2018, which covers equal-pay analysis and corrective plans.
What pay information could employees request under Portugal's draft law?
The draft would give workers the right to their own individual pay level plus the sex-disaggregated average pay for groups doing equal work or work of equal value. Employers would have a proposed two-month window to respond to a written request, but this right is not yet in force.
Which employers would need to report pay gaps in Portugal?
The draft proposes a reporting threshold starting at 50 employees, which is lower than many employers might expect. Under the proposal, employers with 250 or more workers would report annually, first by 7 June 2027, while the 50 to 149 band would report every three years, first by 7 June 2031.
What would trigger a joint pay assessment in Portugal?
The draft sets a proposed trigger of a remaining unjustified pay gap of at least 5% in a category of workers, identified after an inspectorate process. This is a proposal only and is not yet an enforceable rule.
- Pay information request right Art. 7(1)
- Proposed
- Response deadline Art. 7(4)
- 2 months
- Salary range in recruitment Art. 5(1)
- Yes
- Salary history questions banned Art. 5(2)
- Yes
- Joint pay assessment trigger Art. 10(1)
- 5.0%
Own individual pay plus sex-disaggregated average pay for worker groups performing equal work or work of equal value.
Workers would be entitled to their individual pay level and sex-disaggregated average pay for equal/equal-value worker groups.
Read the sourceThe employer must answer in writing within this period.
Proposed employer deadline is two months from the worker's written request.
Read the sourceApplicants receive the pay or pay range before the interview, based on objective, gender-neutral criteria.
Applicants would have a right to the initial pay or pay range before conclusion of the employment contract.
Read the sourceWhether employers are prohibited from asking applicants about their current or previous pay.
Employers would be prohibited from asking candidates about pay history in current or previous employment.
Read the sourceThe unjustified gap that obliges the employer and worker representatives to assess pay together.
After the inspectorate process, a remaining unjustified gap of at least 5% would trigger a JPA notice.
Read the source- Reporting threshold
- 50 employees
- Reporting model
- Proposed hybrid / centralised Operational data-production and filing model for pay-gap reporting: employer-calculated, authority-calculated, hybrid, proposed, pre-existing or absent.
- First report, 250 or more employees
- 7 Jun 2027 (proposed)
- First report, 100 to 149 employees
- 7 Jun 2031 (50-149, proposed)
- Metrics required
- EU seven only Art. 9(1): Seven metrics: mean gap; variable-component gap; median gap; median variable gap; variable-pay participation by sex; quartile distribution by sex; category-level gap split basic and variable.
- Pre-existing regime
- Law 60/2018 remains the live pre-existing equal-pay analysis/corrective-plan regime; the 2026 draft would amend and expand it to partially transpose Directive 2023/970.
- Formal transposition stage
- Published draft
- Scope
- Nationwide
Next milestone
20-day public-appraisal period runs from the 5 Aug 2026 publication; the draft contemplates subsequent government submission to Parliament with priority and urgency.
Primary sources
- Official draft proposal partially transposing Directive (EU) 2023/970; would amend Law No. 60/2018 and the Labour Procedure Code Primary source, checked 10 August 2026
- Formal transposition stage Published draft · proposed · high confidence
- Core employer obligations Published draft · proposed · high confidence
- Transposition scope Nationwide · proposed · high confidence
- Salary range in recruitment Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Salary history questions banned Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Pay information request right Yes · proposed · high confidence
- Response deadline 2 months · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting threshold 50 · proposed · high confidence
- First report, 250 or more employees 7 Jun 2027 (proposed) · proposed · high confidence
- First report, 100 to 149 employees 7 Jun 2031 (50-149, proposed) · proposed · high confidence
- Reporting model Proposed hybrid / centralised · proposed · high confidence
- Joint pay assessment trigger 5% · proposed · high confidence
Change history
This page is maintained by Evenpay from official primary sources and reviewed before publication. It is general information, not legal advice. Requirements vary by member state and change as national laws progress; figures described as proposed are subject to amendment.